BEIJING — Chinese and American officials began talks Monday aimed at ending a bruising tariffs battle between the world's two biggest economies, as Beijing complained over the sighting of a U.S. warship in what it said were Chinese waters.
It was unclear if the ruckus over the warship might disrupt the working level talks being held at the Chinese Commerce Ministry. The two sides have provided scant information about the discussions.
Both sides have expressed optimism over the potential for progress in settling their tariff fight over Beijing's technology ambitions. Yet neither has indicated its stance has changed since a Dec. 1 agreement by Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping to postpone further increases.
Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said Monday during a routine briefing that Chinese military aircraft and naval vessels were dispatched to identify the U.S. vessel and warn it to leave the area near disputed islands in the South China Sea.
“We have made stern complaints with the U.S.,” Lu said. He said the warship, which he said was the destroyer the USS McCampbell, had violated Chinese and international law, infringed on Chinese sovereignty and undermined peace and stability.
“As for whether this move has any impact to the ongoing China-U.S. trade consultations... to properly resolve existing issues of all kinds between China and the U.S. is good for the two countries and the world,” Lu said
But he added, “The two sides both have responsibility to create necessary and good atmosphere to this end.”
There was no immediate comment from the U.S. side about the Chinese complaint.
The American side in the trade talks is being led by a deputy U.S. trade representative, Jeffrey D. Gerrish, according to the U.S. government. The delegation includes agriculture, energy, commerce, treasury and State Department officials.
The talks went ahead despite tensions over the arrest of a Chinese tech executive in Canada on U.S. charges related to possible violations of trade sanctions against Iran.
Trump imposed tariff increases of up to 25 percent on $250 billion of Chinese imports over complaints Beijing steals or pressures companies to hand over technology. Beijing responded by imposing penalties on $110 billion of American goods, slowing customs clearance for U.S. companies and suspending issuing licenses in finance and other businesses.
Economists say the 90-day postponement of tariff increases that had been meant to take effect Jan. 1 may be too short to settle the disputes bedeviling U.S.-Chinese relations.
But cooling economic growth in both countries is raising pressure to reach a settlement.
Chinese growth fell to a post-global crisis low of 6.5 percent in the quarter ending in September. Auto sales tumbled 16 percent in November over a year earlier. Weak real estate sales are forcing developers to cut prices.
The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 3.4 percent in the third quarter, and unemployment is at a five-decade low. But surveys show consumer confidence is weakening because of concern that growth will slow this year.
Washington, Europe and other trading partners complain Beijing's tactics violate its market-opening obligations.
The standoff also reflects American anxiety about China's rise as a potential competitor in telecommunications and other technology. Trump wants Beijing to roll back initiatives intended to create homegrown Chinese leaders in robotics and artificial intelligence.
China's leaders see such strategies as a path to greater prosperity and global influence and have tried to defuse complaints by emphasizing the country's potential as a huge consumer market.
They've also promised to allow more foreign access to its auto, finance and other industries.
Beijing has tried in vain to recruit France, Germany, South Korea and other governments as allies against Trump, but they have echoed U.S. complaints about Chinese industrial policy and market barriers.
The European Union filed its own challenge in the World Trade Organization in June against Chinese rules that the 28-nation trade bloc said hamper the ability of foreign companies to protect and profit from their own technology.
For their part, Chinese officials are unhappy with U.S. curbs on exports of “dual use” technology with possible military applications. They complain China's companies are treated unfairly in national security reviews of proposed corporate acquisitions, though almost all deals are approved unchanged.
Some manufacturers that serve the United States have shifted production to other countries to avoid Trump's tariffs.
- China's 2018 trade surplus with US hits record high $323 billion
- AP-NORC poll: Most Americans oppose Trump's foreign policy
- China says trade talks to continue in Washington next week
- China says trade envoys preparing to go to Washington
- China economy czar heading for Washington tariff war talks
- Why Huawei arrest deepens conflict between US and China
- China promises action on US trade deal but gives no details
- White House hails China trade truce as skeptics raise doubts
- Trump and Xi agreement buys time in trade war
- China says in 'communication' amid report of Trump-Xi meet
- Canada relieved trade deal done, won't forget Trump attacks
- US, China hike tariffs as trade row intensifies
- US, China raise tariffs in new round of trade dispute
- China in struggle to curb reliance on US market, suppliers
- As trade battle rages, an Arkansas town waits and worries
- China vows retaliation for $200 billion US tariff threat
- China push to end reliance on US tech at trade fight's core
- Canada-US relations at a low after Trudeau-Trump trade tiff
- Tough US tariffs on China could begin as early as Friday
- China: Smaller trade surplus, OK. But tech concessions? No.
- US allies to fight Trump's tariffs plan, warn of trade war
- Trump plans to go ahead with steel, aluminum tariffs on EU
- US-China trade talks center on rivalry over technology
- At war with Alibaba: Top brands fight China e-commerce giant
- Trump flips on trade pact, weighs rejoining Pacific-Rim deal
- China denies Xi comments aimed at settling US dispute
- Xi vs Trump: Who has the better hand in potential trade war?