CINCINNATI — A federal trial set to begin in Cincinnati will examine whether Ohio's congressional map is constitutional.
Voter rights groups who sued the state say Republicans used a "partisan gerrymander" to ensure a 12-4 majority in Ohio's congressional delegation. That margin has held in every election since the remapping.
A three-judge panel is scheduled to hear arguments beginning Monday. The trial is expected to last more than two weeks.
The suit says the district maps violate voters' rights to democratically select their representatives.
The state has responded that since Republicans had a 13-5 advantage before Ohio lost two seats due to reapportionment after the 2010 Census, both parties each lost a seat. Ohio officials also note that a new census in 2020 will lead to a redistricting anyway.
- Former Ohio House leader Batchelder defends congressional map in court
- Judges declare Ohio's congressional map unconstitutional (UPDATED)
- Mike DeWine files motion to toss redistricting lawsuit
- ACLU sues over battleground Ohio's congressional districts
- Maryland redistricting case comes before Supreme Court
- Another key redistricting case goes in front of high court
- Ohio lawmakers, groups reach deal on redistricting proposal
- Congressional map raises Democrats' hopes, legal test ahead
- Pennsylvania congressional map battle lands in Supreme Court
- Obama-backed committee targeting races in 11 states -- including Ohio
- Kennedy is key to Supreme Court outcome on partisan maps
- Supreme Court takes up key case about partisan redistricting